The complete power of the Roman father over his children has become proverbial, and the Romans knew that it was an institution peculiar to themselves. It extended not only over all sons and daughters (so long as they had not passed into the manus of a husband), but also over the children of the sons and more remote descendants through males, without any limit other than that imposed by the span of human life.
The oldest male ancestor not only has complete control over the persons of his descendants, even to the extent of inflicting the death penalty on them in the exercise of his domestic jurisdiction, but he alone has any rights in private law. No subordinate member of the family can own any property, and any acquisition that they make go straight to their pater, just as the acquisitions that they make go straight to their pater, just as the acquisitions of a slave become the property of his master. No person, male or female, in potestate can marry without the consent of the pater, and if the sons marry with manus it is the pater who obtains authority over their wives. One limitation there was, presumably from the earliest times: patria potestas has no concern with public law, and a son under power could vote and hold a magistracy just as freely as a paterfamilias. In private law the only limitation, if it can be called one, which we know to have existed at the time of the XII Tables, was the rule that if a father sold his son three times the son was to be free from the father. This rule, as we have seen, was used to make emancipation possible, but it is not known whether emancipation existed already at the time of the XII Tables. It could, clearly, only have existed if the provision concerning the three sales was a restatement of a customary rule.



